Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#16 2005-01-27 18:57:16
- björn
- New Member
- Registered: 2004-11-30
- Posts: 4
Re: The Textpattern SEO PLUGIN thread
> Destry wrote:
> Regardless of SEO or how TXP fares, there are already two places for plugins to be listed, no matter <em>what</em> they are for…
The <a href=“http://forum.textpattern.com/viewtopic.php?id=2193”>Central Plugin List</a> in this forum,
and the <a href=“http://textpattern.org/”>Textpattern Resources</a> site, <em>Plugin</em> section.
Add plugins there like people expect them to be.
This part of the forum is named “plugins”, this kindo says its ok to post threads regarding this subject…
Offline
Re: The Textpattern SEO PLUGIN thread
Marek: meta descriptions are overrated; in some engines you get them displayed, yes, but if and only if the description exactly matches the search query and the search query exactly matches other contents of the page. I’d rather work on quality content than meta tags any day. If you absolutely insist on having them, though, I’d recommend fiddling with custom fields and/or excerpts.
björn: The point is not that it’s inappropriate to post about plugins in this part of the forum. The point is that there are already efforts to have a central list of plugins organized, so people don’t have to hop around in dozens of forum threads to find what they’re looking for. Why have fifty plugin indexes when we could have one?
You cooin’ with my bird?
Offline