Go to main content

Textpattern CMS support forum

You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help

#49 2024-02-28 09:22:15

gaekwad
Server grease monkey
From: People's Republic of Cornwall
Registered: 2005-11-19
Posts: 4,137
GitHub

Re: Is there still a need for a "small content management system"?

Bloke wrote #336777:

I’ll get on that for .com later today, unless anyone wants to jump in ahead and draft something.

Shout if you want a collaborative brainmeat on that, Bloke – I’ve got some time after 8pm.

Offline

#50 2024-02-28 10:29:12

Bloke
Developer
From: Leeds, UK
Registered: 2006-01-29
Posts: 11,269
Website GitHub

Re: Is there still a need for a "small content management system"?

Sweet thank you. I may take you up on that.


The smd plugin menagerie — for when you need one more gribble of power from Textpattern. Bleeding-edge code available on GitHub.

Txp Builders – finely-crafted code, design and Txp

Online

#51 2024-02-28 11:44:10

etc
Developer
Registered: 2010-11-11
Posts: 5,053
Website GitHub

Re: Is there still a need for a "small content management system"?

wet wrote #336772:

Textpattern is one of the last volunteer-driven non-profit publishing tools of our days.

Hmm, not sure this is indisputably flattering from other tools pov.

Offline

#52 2024-02-28 12:07:41

wet
Developer Emeritus
From: Schoerfling, Austria
Registered: 2005-06-06
Posts: 3,323
Website Mastodon

Re: Is there still a need for a "small content management system"?

Maybe you are right. Maybe I’m too naive and OSS-tainted, while paying customers have sometimes struggled to understand why this thing is free as in beer, and assumed it must have a hidden agenda or come from a hobbyist/communist group.

Offline

#53 2024-03-02 02:18:34

phiw13
Plugin Author
From: Japan
Registered: 2004-02-27
Posts: 3,076
Website

Re: Is there still a need for a "small content management system"?

From the original article at 404 media, some stuff that might be or have been crawled:

private posts on public blogs
posts on deleted or suspended blogs
unanswered asks (normally these are not public until they’re answered)
private answers (these only show up to the receiver and are not public)

It seems Automaticc is trying to walk back a little, and that might become opt-in after all (?). Automaticc
(via Nick Heer – Automattic Is Doing Some Weird Stuff With Users’ Public Data)


Where is that emoji for a solar powered submarine when you need it ?
Sand space – admin theme for Textpattern

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB