Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: [feedback] texpattern gets questionable review
Jeremie wrote:
Subsections are in crockery.
Ok, I’ll bite… where? I’m staring straight at ‘sections’ on a crockery install and I don’t see anything that would suggest sub-sections.
Offline
#17 2007-03-30 17:49:10
- marios
- Archived Plugin Author
- Registered: 2005-03-12
- Posts: 1,253
Re: [feedback] texpattern gets questionable review
What I would have liked to be seen in the article, would be a comparison chart with all the aspects looked into, and some kind of evaluation point system for each on each CMS tested.
May be that wasn’t in the budget.
These kind of accessiblility research cost time and money.
regards, marios
⌃ ⇧ < ⎋ ⌃ ⇧ >
Offline
#18 2007-03-31 01:22:47
- Mary
- Sock Enthusiast
- Registered: 2004-06-27
- Posts: 6,236
Re: [feedback] texpattern gets questionable review
Dale: there’s no interface for it yet, it is what’s under the hood (partly done).
Offline
#19 2007-04-01 19:34:05
- Logoleptic
- Plugin Author
- From: Kansas, USA
- Registered: 2004-02-29
- Posts: 482
Re: [feedback] texpattern gets questionable review
kvnmcwebn wrote:
Textpattern is primarily a blogging tool rather than a CMS…
They said the same thing about ExpressionEngine, which makes me think they didn’t look very closely at the power and flexibility of either system. The study was user-focused, however, not developer-focused. That makes it an understandable mistake, but it’s still frustrating to see this myth perpetuated about both products.
Offline