Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2006-01-05 08:29:56
- magicRob
- Member
- Registered: 2005-12-26
- Posts: 14
K2 Conversion
I’ve been using <a href=“http://binarybonsai.com/k2/”>K2</a> on a Wordpress installation, and i really love the layout. So I spent a bit of time this week attempting my first conversion for TXP.
It’s still a work in process, and i’ve got some issue with the comments getting a leading linefeed, but you can see it here:
<a href=“http://test.rovingrob.com/k2/”>http://test.rovingrob.com/k2/</a>
PS. How good is TXP. I love it. Once it clicked, it’s exactly what I’m after….
Offline
Re: K2 Conversion
Out of curiosity, seriously: What differentiates K2 from other bloggish-style layouts that much that you fell in love with it?
Last edited by wet (2006-01-05 09:05:33)
Offline
Re: K2 Conversion
> magicRob wrote:
> I’ve been using <a href=“http://binarybonsai.com/k2/”>K2</a> on a Wordpress installation, and i really love the layout. So I spent a bit of time this week attempting my first conversion for TXP.
I’ve tried something myself, some months ago. Since it’s still in beta, I’ve been waiting…
g.
Offline
#4 2006-01-05 10:47:05
- magicRob
- Member
- Registered: 2005-12-26
- Posts: 14
Re: K2 Conversion
> wet wrote:
> Out of curiosity, seriously: What differentiates K2 from other bloggish-style layouts that much that you fell in love with it?
Not sure why. I particularly like the flexible layout that doesn’t work properly in IE :) It’s clean, has good contrast (especially that Burum style) and serves its purpose.
I didn’t like Kubrick all that much, but K2 is kinda cool looking. Plus most if not all of the functionality is available to TXP users as plugins or hackable from the plugins that are out there… (wohoo).
Offline
Pages: 1