Go to main content

Textpattern CMS support forum

You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help

#25 Yesterday 02:32:35

phiw13
Plugin Author
From: South-Western Japan
Registered: 2004-02-27
Posts: 3,448
Website

Re: The future of Textpattern docs; intentions & plans; RFC

colak wrote #340370:

I don’t. Preliminary suggestions could happen in the forum or as a comment.

Good. I really like that.

(and GH has long been a, the, point of friction for me in that docs pipeline.)


Where is that emoji for a solar powered submarine when you need it ?
Sand space – admin theme for Textpattern
phiw13 on Codeberg

Offline

#26 Yesterday 05:44:40

Bloke
Developer
From: Leeds, UK
Registered: 2006-01-29
Posts: 11,895
Website GitHub

Re: The future of Textpattern docs; intentions & plans; RFC

colak wrote #340370:

I can fully understand why github is currently the most convenient platform for it. Admittedly, I want my convenience too. What are we losing in return for that?

1. Proper, atomic, multi-user version control.

Arguably we don’t have many contributors (which, as phiw13 says, may partly be due to the git requirement) so it’s not a huge showstopper.

2. Distributed changes.

3. Once it’s in Textpattern in Textile or Markdown, we’re limited on exporting it as either of those formats, or html, unless we rely on a back-conversion. And we don’t have change hooks unless we build a plugin to handle it.

If content is stored in a central repository somewhere, we have more options to autonomously reformat it and push it to multiple other platforms, as required (one of which is Textpattern).


The smd plugin menagerie — for when you need one more gribble of power from Textpattern. Bleeding-edge code available on GitHub.

Txp Builders – finely-crafted code, design and Txp

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB