Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#376 2009-07-17 08:58:09
Re: glz_custom_fields
redbot wrote:
I got it emailed from Gerhard on 2008/3/6
aaah, mu genius brain made me read 1.1.3 as the successor to 1.2
duh
Offline
#377 2009-07-30 13:44:02
Re: glz_custom_fields
The million dollar questions is this – have you tried glz_1.13 on txp_4.2.0?
I saw the checksums update last night and knew that the first 4.2.0 release candidate would go live today!
Can’t wait to tap into core support for unlimited custom fields. ;) I have one site that I can’t upgrade until there’s a compatible version of glz_custom_fields.
Offline
#378 2009-08-07 11:14:02
Re: glz_custom_fields
Just discovered an issue with Gerhard’s 4.0.8 which prevents multiple section attributes for article_custom
Offline
#379 2009-08-22 02:22:45
- fbox
- Member
- From: Melbourne
- Registered: 2006-02-18
- Posts: 42
Re: glz_custom_fields
Hi Gerhard and everyone,
I’ve just had an issue with glz_custom_fields_1.1.3 (with custom fields > 10 hack) that had me scratching my head for a while. I haven’t seen the issue documented anywhere (in help or forum), although I’m sure some people will have experienced it before.
After unwittingly adding a glz_custom_field with the name “Title” all instances of txp:title dropped off my site. Disabling plugins, repairing dB, restoring backups didn’t work.
It was only then that I realised my glx_custom_field “Title” was obviously interfering with txp:title. Easy to understand retrospectively, but had me worried for a while! Just wanted to post this here in case anyone else ever has the same issue.
-L.Offline
#380 2009-08-22 06:42:48
Re: glz_custom_fields
fbox wrote:
I realised my glx_custom_field “Title” was obviously interfering with txp:title.
Ah yes, this is a known feature (Micro$oft terminology) of Textpattern but it does make you scratch your head for a bit when it happens doesn’t it?! Often caught me out.
For future reference there is a non-exhaustive list of reserved words over at Textbook’s custom_field entry. It would be good if this could be addressed by putting custom fields in their own name space but whether that is practical to do so remains to be seen.
Last edited by Bloke (2009-08-22 06:44:14)
The smd plugin menagerie — for when you need one more gribble of power from Textpattern. Bleeding-edge code available on GitHub.
Hire Txp Builders – finely-crafted code, design and Txp
Offline
#381 2009-09-02 11:38:45
Re: glz_custom_fields
Gerhard, any news on an upgrade for this plugin to work with 4.2?
Offline
#382 2009-09-02 11:50:23
Offline
#383 2009-09-02 11:56:27
Re: glz_custom_fields
Great – because I have a project on hold waiting for glz_ and mem_ plugin upgrades for 4.2.
Sorry about the MBP – mine works great!
Offline
#384 2009-09-02 12:43:52
Re: glz_custom_fields
BTW, I think Stef made some changes to the plugin to make it work with the latest version of jQuery shipped with 4.2 (not sure about that).
The main issues I see are that select drop downs are not visible on the public side, and the search feature does not work for me – although its possible I have implemented it incorrectly.
Offline
#385 2009-09-02 13:02:22
Re: glz_custom_fields
jstubbs wrote:
BTW, I think Stef made some changes to the plugin
Yes, I have. If you want my modded version as a base, gerhard, drop me a line. The plugin didn’t need much tweaking to get it going.
The smd plugin menagerie — for when you need one more gribble of power from Textpattern. Bleeding-edge code available on GitHub.
Hire Txp Builders – finely-crafted code, design and Txp
Offline
#386 2009-09-02 14:54:21
- redbot
- Plugin Author
- Registered: 2006-02-14
- Posts: 1,410
Re: glz_custom_fields
gerhard wrote:
Will be looking at a plugin upgrade this week and will update the forum thread this weekend. Thanks!
Really good news, thanks!
bloke
Excuse me for the off-topic.
I noticed that in txp 4.2.0 custom fields ids have changed from “custom_x” to “custom-x”. Is there a particular reason for that?
Not complaining, just curious. Actually it took me some time to understand why my pre-4.2.0 jquery plugins were not working
Offline
#387 2009-09-02 15:13:50
Re: glz_custom_fields
redbot wrote:
in txp 4.2.0 custom fields ids have changed from “custom_x” to “custom-x”
OT: Have they? In my copy of 4.0.8 they use HTML id = custom-x and name = custom_x, the same as they do in 4.2.0. Unless I’m not looking in the same place you are?! You mean on the Write tab, yes?
Last edited by Bloke (2009-09-02 15:14:32)
The smd plugin menagerie — for when you need one more gribble of power from Textpattern. Bleeding-edge code available on GitHub.
Hire Txp Builders – finely-crafted code, design and Txp
Offline
#388 2009-09-02 15:35:57
- redbot
- Plugin Author
- Registered: 2006-02-14
- Posts: 1,410
Re: glz_custom_fields
Oops sorry Bloke, I was terribly wrong (again).
I forgot I had glz_custom_fields installed – which causes the ids to change.
Please consider my question non-existant. thank you
Offline
#389 2009-09-02 16:18:20
Re: glz_custom_fields
Bloke wrote:
Yes, I have. If you want my modded version as a base, gerhard, drop me a line. The plugin didn’t need much tweaking to get it going.
Just sent you an e-mail, waiting to see your changes. Thanks for letting me know about your modded version!
I still didn’t check out the new TXP, will need to have a look first at what has changed. I am aware there are some new methods for plugins and in-built support for unlimited custom fields which shouldn’t require a TXP patch to get the plugin working – yay!
Offline
#390 2009-09-02 16:43:27
Re: glz_custom_fields
gerhard wrote:
Just sent you an e-mail, waiting to see your changes.
You got mail ;-)
I am aware there are some new methods for plugins
Yep, they are all documented on Textbook to give you a helping hand.
Looking forward to what you can come up with under the new system…
The smd plugin menagerie — for when you need one more gribble of power from Textpattern. Bleeding-edge code available on GitHub.
Hire Txp Builders – finely-crafted code, design and Txp
Offline