Go to main content

Textpattern CMS support forum

You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help

#1 2008-02-01 19:03:13

diniscorreia
Member
From: Lisbon, Portugal
Registered: 2007-07-18
Posts: 19

Static pages: sticky vs. live

Hi there,

I’ve been using TXP for a while, but I do have a tiny, silly doubt – why should we use sticky articles to manage a simple static page (like a contacts page, for example)?

I understand we might want to use stickies on a section that will also have live articles – but if the section only has a static page, how is a sticky different from having a live article and limit the page to a single article?

Last edited by diniscorreia (2008-02-01 22:54:43)

Offline

#2 2008-02-01 19:31:48

maniqui
Member
From: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Registered: 2004-10-10
Posts: 3,070
Website

Re: Static pages: sticky vs. live

Good question. I think you won’t notice any difference in the output (because there isn’t).

But, for example, I think TxP search doesn’t look on sticky articles by default, so setting your article to sticky will avoid the article appearing on search results.

Maybe there are other things to take into consideration. Anyone?


La música ideas portará y siempre continuará

TXP Builders – finely-crafted code, design and txp

Offline

#3 2008-02-04 03:12:37

Mary
Sock Enthusiast
Registered: 2004-06-27
Posts: 6,236

Re: Static pages: sticky vs. live

Stickies don’t show in feeds.

Offline

#4 2008-05-08 20:35:47

Anton
Plugin Author
From: Alingsås, Sweden
Registered: 2004-11-16
Posts: 138
Website

Re: Static pages: sticky vs. live

I remember once in the Textpattern bronze age or so, when sticky articles could be viewed just like regular articles (and just like the stickies on this and most forums too btw), anyone knows why this has changed? Why can’t a sticky article be viewed using its permlink (or can it!?)?

TIA

Offline

#5 2008-05-08 21:04:01

maniqui
Member
From: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Registered: 2004-10-10
Posts: 3,070
Website

Re: Static pages: sticky vs. live


La música ideas portará y siempre continuará

TXP Builders – finely-crafted code, design and txp

Offline

#6 2008-05-08 22:18:34

Anton
Plugin Author
From: Alingsås, Sweden
Registered: 2004-11-16
Posts: 138
Website

Re: Static pages: sticky vs. live

Thanx maniqui, I guess it does. (Funny, I couldn’t search narrowly enough to find that post..)

Offline

#7 2008-05-09 14:47:23

mrdale
Member
From: Walla Walla
Registered: 2004-11-19
Posts: 2,215
Website

Re: Static pages: sticky vs. live

TXPs forced mutual exclusivity of Sticky/Live behavior is retarded, pure and simple.

The obvious rock solid solution to presenting static information is with article IDs

Offline

#8 2008-05-09 15:48:21

colak
Admin
From: Cyprus
Registered: 2004-11-20
Posts: 9,091
Website GitHub Mastodon Twitter

Re: Static pages: sticky vs. live

mrdale wrote:

TXPs forced mutual exclusivity of Sticky/Live behavior is retarded, pure and simple.

The obvious rock solid solution to presenting static information is with article IDs

Although I know what you are saying, the omission of sticky articles from the feeds is sometimes a very handy one. Sticky articles can also be presented wherever one wants without having to figure out how to get rid of the duplicate entry in article lists.


Yiannis
——————————
NeMe | hblack.art | EMAP | A Sea change | Toolkit of Care
I do my best editing after I click on the submit button.

Online

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB