Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2006-11-29 00:12:18
- marios
- Archived Plugin Author
- Registered: 2005-03-12
- Posts: 1,253
noshade attribute v4.0.4
The default lofi article form contains the following html tag with a noshade and size attribute.
<hr size="1" noshade="noshade" />What is that ? I’ve never heard of such a thing.
Those seem to be deprecated attributes for HTML 4.01 and would lead to invalidation.
Wouldn’t it make sense to throw these out ?
This is in version 4.0.4
regards, marios
Last edited by marios (2006-11-29 00:51:39)
⌃ ⇧ < ⎋ ⌃ ⇧ >
Offline
Re: noshade attribute v4.0.4
It makes the <hr> flat, like border-bottom: 1px solid #000;, versus somewhat 3D. Some examples are here (or if you disable styles on the forum, a “3D” hr is used for signatures).
Offline
#3 2006-11-29 00:46:05
- marios
- Archived Plugin Author
- Registered: 2005-03-12
- Posts: 1,253
Re: noshade attribute v4.0.4
What I meant is inside a preinstalled default form of TXP version 4.0.4 you will find this tag inside the form lofi.
I’d have posted this to the Bug Reports, but there isn’t such a forum anymore.
TXP uses XHTML, and therefore such old proprietary HTML (deprecated) would lead to invalidation, in the case, that someone uses this form.
regards, marios
Last edited by marios (2006-11-29 00:56:17)
⌃ ⇧ < ⎋ ⌃ ⇧ >
Offline
Re: noshade attribute v4.0.4
Oh, durr…Sorry, I’m writing (and procrastinating) a term paper – my reading skills are terrible right now :).
It should definitely be removed. Kinda related: Do many people use the lofi form with their out of the box template?
Offline
#5 2006-11-29 02:51:09
- Mary
- Sock Enthusiast
- Registered: 2004-06-27
- Posts: 6,236
Re: noshade attribute v4.0.4
It’s not invalid in the default template, because that template is also using a transitional doctype.
Offline
#6 2006-12-01 21:13:34
- marios
- Archived Plugin Author
- Registered: 2005-03-12
- Posts: 1,253
Re: noshade attribute v4.0.4
Mary wrote:
It’s not invalid in the default template, because that template is also using a transitional doctype.
Agreed. But some people like to put their doctype to strict, so they can build up good coding habits, to get up to date for tomorrow’s demands.
@mary, here is another questions.
The popup_comments form contains this tag:
<txp:popup_comments />The tag don’t seem to be documented in the documentation
(deprecated or not ?)
regards, marios
Last edited by marios (2006-12-01 22:50:31)
⌃ ⇧ < ⎋ ⌃ ⇧ >
Offline
Pages: 1