Improving TXP Image Management

marios · 2006-04-29 21:07:42

One more thing, for the developersupport, @alexandra, maybe you could consider to put up a donation page with a paypal link (for all devs workin on image handling support), I think that people would be willing to donate beforehand.

regards, marios

Last edited by marios (2006-04-30 22:17:53)

alexandra · 2006-04-30 07:52:23

What needs to happen to start the write up? An inventory of all ideas and needs. Level of need.

Exactly. That is what i was thinking of. First step would be an inventory of suggested improvements. Maybe not all single suggestions but the main ones. Second step can be a draft for programmers. We can write this in the Wiki. If you agree, set up a page and send me the link. I am not familiar with the wiki (language) yet.

@Marios – i wholeheartedly agree with the donation. I even would go much further and kind of ‘sell’ the new txp version. My idea is a Drop Cash /Ransome solution: new version will be released once xxx US$ are collected. From the money coders and supporters should be paid. What you think?

Last edited by alexandra (2006-04-30 09:29:42)

marios · 2006-04-30 11:37:02

@alexanra ,I think Dropcash is ok, but then you have to set a limit, that can sometimes have disappointing results,
and not everyone is so familiar with it.

regards

jameslomax · 2006-04-30 21:40:26

Nils: I’d suggest that whether its like Adobe Bridge or not is not really the point, or an objective, especially if we are looking to a ‘txp style’. Although its certainly useful to identify the good ideas in that kind of interface, because its custom-designed for efficient image management – which, I think we all agree, txp isn’t.

I’m slightly alarmed to see this suddenly become a topic for SVN and the txp core…..not because its not a good idea in itself, but because

a) much of the work has already been done for a good plug in and
b) it could take much longer to organise and build if this happens, because it brings in unreliable variables and uncertainties like who is available to do what, and when.

squaredeye · 2006-04-30 22:35:49

Jameslomax,
i was thinking that it was clear from the beginning, that this has been a ‘core’ project, and while plugins are great, the idea of having this core has been the premise of the project (core being the most effecient for many reasons).

The topic has not turned, it originated, though perhaps not clearly enough, in the land of ‘core’

alexandra · 2006-05-01 08:12:02

@Marios – so far the image improvement is really good i am convinced drop cash will work. My experience with donations are not the best. If you ask for donations, everybody thinks someone else did donate and he/she gets away with no donation.
As well i am convinced programmers should be paid for good work. and it is an incentive to get something like US$ 300.

However first we have to write a draft for potential programmers…

soulship · 2006-05-01 17:18:25

Sucks when you forget to subscribe to a thread and check it a week later.

Skubidu

Thanks for your sketches. So am I right when I say you like to have a more Adobe Bridge like style?

Well something along those lines. For instance I have a friends site that has over 400 images on it with more weekly. It has become learly imposible to manage it effectively once it was over 200. The multi-image view would allow for easier tracking of what is there, and multiple image deletion in one fell swoop is a must.

Plugin or Core:

This has got to be in the core release at some point and I would really gear it towards that. It could well be released as a “hack” or plugin until that day comes.

Who can help?

I can do whatever I can do. Not sure what that is, but typically I have 2hrs a week I could offer. Whether it’s with testing ( I have a test install I keep on txd and one I keep on dreamhost) Or whether it’s css & xhtml.

Jamie

Last edited by soulship (2006-05-01 17:18:36)

squaredeye · 2006-05-01 17:26:08

Jamie,
Sweet. Noted. I think Alex and I (possibly Hak as well) will start on this list soon.
Count yourself recruited.

Good suggeestions.

mrdale · 2006-05-02 15:19:37

I can help if you can think of something I could use my design/css/html/writing skills for. Not much help other than that.

squaredeye · 2006-05-02 16:36:24

Mrdale,
Great.

Soulship.
Alex.
Marios.
Hakjoon.
ma_smith
Mr_dale

Lookin good.

alexandra · 2006-05-02 18:44:40

Hope i can bribe Bastian to join ;)

(Matthew, would you mind opening up a page on the wiki for the draft – or do you like to use the one with the images??)

squaredeye · 2006-05-02 19:27:41

Alex,
I will do that. I think we can refer to the Improved Image Handling page, but should start a clean one for the write up, and possibly a different environment for the code?

…I ended up just placing it in the “discussion area” of the img_handling_page and here it is.

:)

Bastian · 2006-05-02 23:17:29

I just finished my cssreboot and i’m ready to join, particularly for that write-tab stuff

jameslomax · 2006-05-04 00:42:23

Far out.
Damn, I wish I was a coder, and could a) build my own site entirely on my own and b) join in with this cool stuff. Look forward to it guys.

Logoleptic · 2006-05-07 20:20:16

I just ran into a problem I’d love to see addressed. In the current version of Txp, text entered into the image description field doesn’t get the full Textile treatment when it’s output (with upm_img_popper). Adding a link to the description field is impossible, since Textile links don’t work and (X)HTML tags have their angle brackets turned into entities. Other advanced formatting is, similarly, either impossible or unnecessarily difficult.

This is somewhat symptomatic of a more generalized problem with Textpattern: Textile is not pervasive enough in the system. If Txp is going to use this powerful formatting language, it should do so through out the system in a consistent manner.

Textpattern CMS

Textpattern CMS support forum

#136 2006-04-29 21:07:42

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#137 2006-04-30 07:52:23

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#138 2006-04-30 11:37:02

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#139 2006-04-30 21:40:26

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#140 2006-04-30 22:35:49

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#141 2006-05-01 08:12:02

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#142 2006-05-01 17:18:25

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#143 2006-05-01 17:26:08

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#144 2006-05-02 15:19:37

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#145 2006-05-02 16:36:24

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#146 2006-05-02 18:44:40

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#147 2006-05-02 19:27:41

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#148 2006-05-02 23:17:29

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#149 2006-05-04 00:42:23

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

#150 2006-05-07 20:20:16

Re: Improving TXP Image Management

Board footer