Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#157 2005-01-22 22:08:11
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> dragontiger wrote:
> > jason wrote:
> IT IS A TWO YEAR OLD BETA VERSION.
> well… more than interesting!, two years ago there was a layout ‘chooser’ built-in ?
> is that oooold beta available anywhere ? I am interested to grab one ;-)
I still have it running here
Offline
#158 2005-01-22 22:09:26
Re: rc2 and 1.0
Fascinating… someone should do a history of this thing’s making one of these days.
edit: I mean the whole textpattern textdrive story… not just the development cycle
Last edited by bleveck (2005-01-22 22:10:10)
Offline
#159 2005-01-22 22:11:04
Offline
#160 2005-01-22 22:15:23
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> bleveck wrote:
> Fascinating… someone should do a history of this thing’s making one of these days.
Well, Dean was a well-known “blogger” and txp was one of the first hand-rolled blogging systems written in PHP that was going to be out there. Time-wise there’s this
{holy shit, is Ray even commenting on that thread?? Notice that was back in the days when you could comment on Textism.com and a version of textpattern was alredy driving the site}.
Another example, the pre-gamma release CSS thing showed up in Web Design on a Shoestring
Offline
#161 2005-01-22 22:50:52
- Ray
- Member
- Registered: 2004-03-02
- Posts: 154
Re: rc2 and 1.0
<span style=“color:#666;”> jason wrote:</span>
<span style=“color:#666;”>> > Ray wrote:</span>
<span style=“color:#666;”>> I think Jason’s trying to give us a heads up on features.</span>
<span style=“color:#666;”>> How about an ETA Jason?</span>
<span style=“color:#666;”>THAT SCREENSHOT IS VERY VERY OLD. IT IS NOT TEXTPATTERN 1.0. IT IS A TWO YEAR OLD BETA VERSION.
</span>
I was refering to the “better have native clean URL support and let me get rid of that damn ID number”. But maybe I was getting ahead of myself.
{edit… whoops… wrong color}
Last edited by Ray (2005-01-22 22:53:57)
Offline
#162 2005-01-22 23:12:57
Re: rc2 and 1.0
Sweet screenshot Jason!
I’ve wanted to hear(or see) those stuf. All I want was PEACE OF INFORMATION.
Now that I can go to BED and have a nice dream of new TxP…
Offline
#163 2005-01-22 23:30:07
- EddieG5
- Member
- From: Georgia
- Registered: 2004-03-03
- Posts: 96
Re: rc2 and 1.0
Take your time. Release it when you feel good about it, not when we want it. The complaints would be double if Dean released something that wasn’t as solid as what we’ve grown to expect from TXP and Textdrive.
Cheers,
eg
Offline
#164 2005-01-23 00:12:07
Re: rc2 and 1.0
http://textism.com/article/663/pomegranate
Note to self: remember to extract Detextile from Dean at some point too
Offline
#165 2005-01-23 00:37:57
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> bleveck wrote:
> Note to self: remember to extract Detextile from Dean at some point too
Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
Offline
#166 2005-01-23 07:14:49
- Kibitzer
- Member
- From: Melbourne, Australia
- Registered: 2004-05-24
- Posts: 44
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> bleveck wrote:
> Note to self: remember to extract Detextile from Dean at some point too
thought Dean gave up on Detextile? i vaguely remember reading some post of his that said so. i think.
VC200 Member #69 — VCTWO Member — Mixed Gorilla
“YES!” “That would be an ecumenical matter!”
Offline
#167 2005-01-23 07:32:41
Re: rc2 and 1.0
>thought Dean gave up on Detextile? i vaguely remember
> reading some post of his that said so. i think.
Naw, he doesn’t give up. It sits and stews.
Use what ever analogy you want (good chili, boils, …)
Last edited by jason (2005-01-23 07:44:44)
Offline
#168 2005-01-23 13:39:28
Re: rc2 and 1.0
That has always been one of my biggest frustrations with Textile. Even more so when Aaron Swartz wrote html2text pretty much simultaneously with the release of Markdown.
Offline