Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Markdown support?
colak wrote:
the problem I foresee …
Should impose no problems if we cater for this requirement early. Drupal, for instance, allows pluggable text filters, and lives happily.
Aside: I particularly dig this quote from the Drupal Textile project:
[…] implements the popular Textile markup shorthand made popular by Movable Type and Basecamp.
Honour where honour is due…
Offline
#14 2009-09-01 10:23:00
- policleto
- Member
- From: Pisa, Italy
- Registered: 2007-08-28
- Posts: 24
Re: Markdown support?
The honour of textile is not in discussion, at least is not for me.
My point is not a last ditch duel between textile and putmarkupnamehere but a possible textpattern enhancement.
Do not misunderstand my words: I think textile (like txp) is a great piece of software, but I think all the things could be improved and textpattern in not an exception.
Last edited by policleto (2009-09-01 10:23:53)
Offline
Re: Markdown support?
nested paragraphs in list
Is this valid ?
more precisely, do you mean paragraphs inside list elements (li) or paragraphs inside paragaphs inside a list?
Offline
#16 2009-09-01 18:35:14
- masa
- Member
- From: Asturias, Spain
- Registered: 2005-11-25
- Posts: 1,091
Re: Markdown support?
Personally I don’t see the need to introduce another formatting language.
Textpattern & Textile makes a lot of sense from a branding point of view, and clients usually get the hang of it pretty quickly. I also prefer Textpattern’s header formatting syntax with simple h1, h2 etc. – easier to identify when scrolling through long articles.
In my experience end-users don’t bother much with nesting of list items.
Offline
#17 2009-09-01 21:31:36
- Neko
- Member
- Registered: 2004-03-18
- Posts: 458
Re: Markdown support?
masa wrote:
Personally I don’t see the need to introduce another formatting language.
I’m with you on this one, although I don’t have a particular reason to not support policleto’s idea.
IMVHO the Dev Team shouldn’t have to introduce any new markup language, just provide the right hooks. At this point, any plug-in author could provide a dedicated solution for Markdown, BBcrap and so on. Or a user could upload a markdown.php inside the /lib folder or whatever.
I don’t see the whole process having an high priority, tho.
Last edited by Neko (2009-09-01 21:33:59)
Offline
#18 2009-09-01 23:32:16
- policleto
- Member
- From: Pisa, Italy
- Registered: 2007-08-28
- Posts: 24
Re: Markdown support?
I also prefer Textpattern’s header formatting syntax with simple h1, h2 etc. – easier to identify when scrolling through long articles.
I think it’s a matter of taste, but in general Markdown sintax is more readable though give less power editing html entities.
Yes Neko, this is what I mean: hooks!
Not a particular markup language, but an opportunity to write my own.
I can’t agree with some opinion which retain that what exist is always enough.
I think there is a margin of improvement, everywhere.
Maybe it’s neither an high-priority feature nor a useless one.
Last edited by policleto (2009-09-02 10:38:42)
Offline
Re: Markdown support?
Oh, sorry – I wasn’t aware that this has been requested a while ago already. Now, in 2012, I find that many areas decided to make use of Markdown. Writers and Coders alike share in interest in having a choice. I would still leave Textile as the default for Textpattern but make way for a plugin that allows a system-wide or by post preference of the interpreter to be used.
For anyone already using Markdown on a daily basis it will make life much easier. Or maybe it is just me.
Yoko for Textpattern – A free blog theme • Minimum Theme – If all you want to do is write.
Note: I am currently not actively using Textpattern, so I am not in the forums very often
Offline