Textpattern CMS

#1 2007-04-10 02:17:23

squaredeye

Member

From: Greenville, SC

Registered: 2005-07-31

Posts: 1,495

Website

Query Times vs. JS

What kind of difference would one be looking at for these kinds of calls/scripts? Timewise?

The original: (from a form)
bc. <li <txp:zem_nth step=1 of=2>class=“odd”</txp:zem_nth>>
<p class=“post-date”><txp:posted format=”%b/%d/%y” /></p>
<h3 class=“post-title”><txp:permlink><txp:title /></txp:permlink></h3>
</li>

The new: also in a form:
bc. <li>
<p class=“post-date”><txp:posted format=”%b/%d/%y” /></p>
<h3 class=“post-title”><txp:permlink><txp:title /></txp:permlink></h3>
</li>

With this in the head:
bc.. <script type=“text/javascript”>
// <![CDATA[
$(document).ready(function() { $(“ul#tag-list li:nth-child(odd)”).addClass(“odd”); });

// ]]>
</script>

---

• I am Squared Eye and I am launching have launched Pattern Tap

#2 2007-04-10 07:01:07

wet

Developer Emeritus

From: Schoerfling, Austria

Registered: 2005-06-06

Posts: 3,330

Website Mastodon

Re: Query Times vs. JS

The 2nd alternative’s time consumption largely depends on the client’s current state of technology (browser make & model, operating system, cpu horse power, sea tide, moon phase,…), so all assumptions would invalidate themselves immediately without further specs on that parts.

My personal advice: Unless you are colouring a thousand rows, don’t spend your mind on that.

#3 2007-04-10 17:55:26

Mary

Sock Enthusiast

Registered: 2004-06-27

Posts: 6,236

Re: Query Times vs. JS

http://forum.textpattern.com/viewtopic.php?id=21995