You are not logged in.
2006-11-09 10:45:41
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
I just realized that Textpattern 4.0.4 behaves different with upm_image.
The code <txp:upm_image image_id="2113" form="lightbox" /> is, when used in 4.0.4 in the body of an article, enclosed with a p-tag. This p-tag was not included by textile in 4.0.3.
This results in changing behavior of image templates.
Offline
2006-11-09 16:39:19
- Logoleptic
- Plugin Author
- lambda
- Real name: Adam Messinger
- From: Kansas, USA
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
Matthias, try putting a single space character before that tag. I haven’t upgraded to 4.0.4 yet, but in past versions adding the space would mysteriously prevent Textile from mistreating my template tags like that. You might also try enclosing it in a div of a width that matches your image. A span might work as well.
“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”
— Hanlon’s Razor
Offline
2006-11-09 19:14:27
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
Well, this is a workaround, but not really a solution. I think, this is a textile bug, which I should file there….
Or is Mary probably planning to insert also a “blank” before her tags with the popper?
Offline
2006-11-09 19:28:39
- Logoleptic
- Plugin Author
- lambda
- Real name: Adam Messinger
- From: Kansas, USA
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
So it worked, then?
Not a bad idea about including the extra space in the popper, by the way.
“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”
— Hanlon’s Razor
Offline
2006-11-09 19:51:59
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
Customers who bought this item also bought wet_for_each_image. ;-)
Try wet_quicklink | Me | @rwetzlmayr | +Robert Wetzlmayr | Repos
Offline
2006-11-09 21:33:44
- Logoleptic
- Plugin Author
- lambda
- Real name: Adam Messinger
- From: Kansas, USA
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
That’s pretty slick, wet. It’s kind of like wet_thumbfilter on steroids. :-)
“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”
— Hanlon’s Razor
Offline
2006-11-10 19:47:09
- Mary
- Sock Enthusiast
- omega
- From: Canada
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
If you were gonna go that route, why not use the plugin’s own built-in customization option instead of layering another plugin on top of it?
Anyway, report Textile bugs here.
My email address has changed recently. If you need to contact me, use the forum contact form.
Offline
2006-11-11 00:33:39
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
Mary wrote:
If you were gonna go that route, why not use the plugin’s own built-in customization option instead of layering another plugin on top of it?
As I haven’t found a way for upm_image to render lists of images/thumbs (besides article images), I might have missed something. How’s that supposed to be done?
Try wet_quicklink | Me | @rwetzlmayr | +Robert Wetzlmayr | Repos
Offline
2006-11-11 00:58:02
- Mary
- Sock Enthusiast
- omega
- From: Canada
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
Ah, manually created/static galleries. Yeah, it won’t do that.
My email address has changed recently. If you need to contact me, use the forum contact form.
Offline
2006-11-12 16:43:25
Re: [ORPHAN] upm_image: More powerful image display
Just updated couple of sites to 4.04 and upgraded to 0.45 upm_image – upm_img_popper 1.1 too.
Notice that the “insert image” has disappeared from the write tab? Anyone else seen this? Its not a cache issue – I flushed it out on all sites.
Is it supposed to be like this until the 4.04 upm_plugin upgrades? (assuming Mary is doing that!!)
TXP Tips | @txptips | Me | @jonathanstubbs | Github
TXP Builders – finely-crafted code, design and txp @txpbuilders
Offline