Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#166 2005-01-23 07:14:49
- Kibitzer
- Member
- From: Melbourne, Australia
- Registered: 2004-05-24
- Posts: 44
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> bleveck wrote:
> Note to self: remember to extract Detextile from Dean at some point too
thought Dean gave up on Detextile? i vaguely remember reading some post of his that said so. i think.
VC200 Member #69 — VCTWO Member — Mixed Gorilla
“YES!” “That would be an ecumenical matter!”
Offline
#167 2005-01-23 07:32:41
Re: rc2 and 1.0
>thought Dean gave up on Detextile? i vaguely remember
> reading some post of his that said so. i think.
Naw, he doesn’t give up. It sits and stews.
Use what ever analogy you want (good chili, boils, …)
Last edited by jason (2005-01-23 07:44:44)
Offline
#168 2005-01-23 13:39:28
Re: rc2 and 1.0
That has always been one of my biggest frustrations with Textile. Even more so when Aaron Swartz wrote html2text pretty much simultaneously with the release of Markdown.
Offline
#169 2005-01-23 14:58:15
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> Kibitzer wrote:
> thought Dean gave up on Detextile? i vaguely remember reading some post of his that said so. i think.
Hope not. Someone will need this to implement bidirectionnal ServOO :-p
Offline
#170 2005-01-24 12:59:15
Re: rc2 and 1.0
Does anyone know where the ‘css layout’ pre-gamma release of textpattern is available to downlaod and play with? :D
koopd.com
seventytwo.co.uk
—-
Graphic Designer, Wed Designer and Developer.
Offline
#171 2005-01-24 14:27:25
- marco
- Member
- From: Montreal
- Registered: 2004-02-24
- Posts: 62
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> swf wrote:
> i forgot all about the old selectable template layouts
That was one of the best features, although only a few of them actually worked.
Anyway, there are now a lot of pure-CSS templates for all those typical layouts in case anybody wants to add that feature it back in. I’ll post the links if there is any interest.
Offline
#172 2005-01-24 16:18:00
Re: rc2 and 1.0
I’ll be happy if we can just get a release soon, and especially if it supports tags for image captions. I’ve been holding off on a project for the release, and really can’t hold off much longer. And image captions would just make my day …
Last edited by theturninggate (2005-01-24 16:27:45)
Offline
#173 2005-01-24 16:36:18
Re: rc2 and 1.0
That be certainly be a very nice addition, but somehow I don’t think this is for 1.0.
Offline
#174 2005-01-24 17:15:31
Re: rc2 and 1.0
> theturninggate wrote:
> I’ll be happy if we can just get a release soon, and especially if it supports tags for image captions. I’ve been holding off on a project for the release, and really can’t hold off much longer. And image captions would just make my day …
Maybe somebody could whip up a plugin. Why not?
Liberal. Geek.
Offline
#175 2005-01-24 18:02:08
Re: rc2 and 1.0
Well, for me the “Why not?” would simply be because I don’t know how. But if someone could manage it, I’d certainly shower my kudos down upon them. :)
Offline
#176 2005-01-24 18:05:01
Re: rc2 and 1.0
If it can be done with a plugin, it’s definitely a job for a plugin.
A nice caption, with all the semantic we might need, and easy visual integration. Ahhh….
Offline
#177 2005-01-24 19:44:08
Re: rc2 and 1.0
What would be nice is that it works on Dreamhost servers without an unnecessary amount of head-spinning server side surgery.
That’s the only item on my final release wishlist.
Offline
#178 2005-01-25 02:39:41
Re: rc2 and 1.0
What is with Dreamhost? I don’t get it. There are so many cheaper, more feature packed hosting companies out there. Why would you choose Dreamhost?
I’ve used 3 hosts (less than $7/mo, unlimited bandwidth, unlimited subdomains, unlimited databases) other than Dreamhost and I’ve never had any problems with ANY CMS.
Maybe it’s not TXP that needs fixing… maybe you just need a better web host.
Offline
#179 2005-01-25 03:17:25
Re: rc2 and 1.0
Never had any problems with dreamhost. At all
Offline
#180 2005-01-25 12:55:27
Re: rc2 and 1.0
I’ll second that – Dreamhost has been my best experience with a webhost to date. And it’s hardly what I’d call expensive for what you do get.
Offline