Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Contemporary font sizing for the concernedly lazy
philwareham wrote #327089:
Not meaning to piss on Tailwind, …, and throwing shade on it just like they now do to Bootstrap (which they all loved 4 years ago).
So if not Bootstrap what do all the cool young turks like these days?
…. texted postive
Offline
Re: Contemporary font sizing for the concernedly lazy
Well it seems to be Taiilwind right now but it’ll be something else in a couple of months, no doubt.
Offline
Re: Contemporary font sizing for the concernedly lazy
bici wrote #327112:
So if not Bootstrap what do all the cool young turks like these days?
You could watch this for updates: stateofcss.com – they’ve taken and closed the survey, presumably they’re collating and presenting the data. I very much enjoyed poking through the 2019 results when they arrived.
Edit: frameworks from 2019
Last edited by gaekwad (2020-11-27 18:09:20)
Offline
#19 2020-11-28 04:54:04
- GugUser
- Member
- From: Quito (Ecuador)
- Registered: 2007-12-16
- Posts: 1,477
Re: Contemporary font sizing for the concernedly lazy
philwareham wrote #327091:
Do you mean this shorthand?:
font: 12px / 14px;...If so, then the first value is
font-size, second isline-height.
The line height has no unit.
Offline
Re: Contemporary font sizing for the concernedly lazy
GugUser wrote #327124:
The line height has no unit.
tut tut … :-) The line-height property can take a lenght as value (since CSS1 !). MDN doc
But anything other than a number (unitless) and the keyword normal is not such a good idea™.
Where is that emoji for a solar powered submarine when you need it ?
Sand space – admin theme for Textpattern
phiw13 on Codeberg
Offline
Re: Contemporary font sizing for the concernedly lazy
Yeah I’d never use that rule in production, it was just for an explanation!
Offline
Re: Contemporary font sizing for the concernedly lazy
PS: I love how civilised this is, peak Textpattern right here.
Offline