Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: SPAM prevention based on commenter's "Web" field
zem wrote:
The way Textpattern handles spam estimates is a bit limited, so I’m open to suggestions on how to improve it. A couple of possibilities:
- Store the message(s) in the comment table when saving it, and perhaps remove the evaluator log
Hi zem, I have posted some ideas about previeng comments and improving the anti-spam mechanism I have been drafting during the last days in my Google Notebook.
Offline
#14 2007-04-18 07:28:40
- Mary
- Sock Enthusiast
- Registered: 2004-06-27
- Posts: 6,236
Re: SPAM prevention based on commenter's "Web" field
I think the core should have it’s own blacklist and whitelist support, which ships blank. It’s not fool-proof, but its an additional tool that can evolve based upon the individual site’s troublemakers.
Offline
Re: SPAM prevention based on commenter's "Web" field
Mary wrote:
I think the core should have it’s own blacklist and whitelist support, which ships blank.
I second this as I think that it’ll be a great improvement.
Yiannis
——————————
NeMe | hblack.art | EMAP | A Sea change | Toolkit of Care
I do my best editing after I click on the submit button.
Offline
#16 2007-05-07 22:24:59
- WebKat
- Member
- Registered: 2007-01-16
- Posts: 301
Re: SPAM prevention based on commenter's "Web" field
Yes I would be all for a way to have spam auto-deleted. This plugin hasn’t falsely flagged anything as spam yet, so I trust it. Even if it did on ocassion delete something that wasn’t spam, it would be worth it for the time saved in deleting spam.
—
WebKat
Offline
Re: SPAM prevention based on commenter's "Web" field
Hi
I just patched the plugin with the extentions from ruud.
Well I think, textpattern needs good anti-spam-plugins, which are easy to handle. So I would encourage a release of ruuds version as a plugin.
For not so sophisticated users a blacklist which can be edited easyly through the backend.
If the plugin flags a comment as a spam oder moderate, this should be mentioned in the E-Mail the author gets, and probably in the email is a delete link.
For the case, that a readers comment is flagged as spam, probably a second question in the preview screen would be good, e.g. the captcha or just a simple math question.
Offline
#18 2009-02-28 12:02:36
- Neko
- Member
- Registered: 2004-03-18
- Posts: 458
Re: SPAM prevention based on commenter's "Web" field
Is something changed in the way TXP handles comments recently?
Because this part of the plug-in doesn’t seem to work anymore:
$needle = "http://";
$urlcount = substr_count($checking,$needle);
if($urlcount > $spam_count_limit)
{ $spam=1; }
Offline