Textpattern CMS support forum
You are not logged in. Register | Login | Help
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: Textile syntax for textpatterned content
…it is specifically made “general purpose”…
If I am not mistaken, this forum already uses a derivative version of Textile which has special tags increasing the usability of Textile for a software support environment like that (bq.., bc..)?
Wouldn’t the same preconditions allow a version of Textile which features an in-depth integration with Textpattern, independently from all other instances of Textile (not to mention slightly varying implementations of Textile markup by other authors, like Textile2…)?
Offline
#17 2006-05-10 06:12:43
- Mary
- Sock Enthusiast
- Registered: 2004-06-27
- Posts: 6,236
Re: Textile syntax for textpatterned content
If I am not mistaken, this forum already uses a derivative version of Textile…
No, it’s testing out new versions of Textile. bq and bc are going to be added to all.
Offline
#18 2006-05-10 14:09:38
- guiguibonbon
- Member
- Registered: 2006-02-20
- Posts: 296
Re: Textile syntax for textpatterned content
I looked a the code yesterday, and bq and stuff already seems to be integrated by default. But the nice thing is, there’s absolutely no obligation to actually rewrite textile. We could really just create an additional class, in a separate file, wich would either be applied before or after textile itself. It should be quite easy — if only I knew PCRE a little better. Working on that though.
Offline
#19 2006-05-10 14:26:11
- guiguibonbon
- Member
- Registered: 2006-02-20
- Posts: 296
Re: Textile syntax for textpatterned content
concerning the linked versus !23t!:!23! issue, thought a bit about it, and I came to think the first option is better, the latter being a bit odd since you’d expect the ! ! syntax to actually display an image, and really makes no sens since such syntax does not work in current textile. Another issue is the alignment. Currently, even on images, > = and < add an align attribute, which is against the recommandations. Wonder if we shouldn’t rather use inline styling. But maybe this is something textile 2 already adresses… Edit : no sorry, this is already textile 2 I’m talking about. It seams it’s textile2 that’s installed by default in txp.. What new versions are y’all talking about then?
Last edited by guiguibonbon (2006-05-10 14:32:42)
Offline